Close Menu
The Village Reporter
  • Home
  • Subscribe
  • Current Edition
  • Store Locations
  • Photo Albums
  • Rate Card
  • Classifieds
  • Contact Us
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Sunday, March 15
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube TikTok
Login
The Village Reporter
  • Home
  • Subscribe
  • Current Edition
  • Store Locations
  • Photo Albums
  • Rate Card
  • Classifieds
  • Contact Us
The Village Reporter
Home»News»Williams County Sheriff Seeking Ability To Hire More Deputies
News

Williams County Sheriff Seeking Ability To Hire More Deputies

By Newspaper StaffMay 5, 2016Updated:November 30, 2016No Comments5 Mins Read
Share Facebook Twitter Email Copy Link

Sheriff TownsBy: James Pruitt
THE VILLAGE REPORTER

Williams County Sheriff Steven Towns wants three new deputies to beef up his road patrol, but the county commissioners say there isn’t enough money to do it.

The sheriff and his top deputy, Lt. Greg Ruskey appeared before the commissioners April 14 to plead their case after offering documentation of the number of deputies on staff and a look at the number of incidents since 2008. The commissioners saw nothing new in the presentation and did not assent to the request.

Towns said his staff is currently overworked with only eight road deputies on the roster, half of what the department had before layoffs in 2009. As a result, his deputies are responding to 100 more calls each per year.


Commissioner Alan Word, a former sheriff himself, disputed Towns’ numbers and suggested the real increase is about 12 calls per deputy per year. He believes the problem resides with Towns’ management of resources.

From Towns’ perspective this would require an extra $143,000 for the salaries and benefits for three deputies. The sheriff said since the county budget is back to where it was before the Great Recession, there shouldn’t be a problem.

The commissioners released a breakout of costs for three deputies which includes salary, vehicle, insurance, workmen’s comp and other benefits to be $301,173 for the first year and $190,000 for the years following without factoring in any raises.


“We are not back to normal,” Commissioner Lewis Hilkert said.

According to Hilkert, the county is still $850,000 short 2008 revenues.

But Ruskey said all that doesn’t change the fact the department is still shorthanded needs help.

“We are doing double the work,” Ruskey said. “Asking for three deputies is pretty reasonable request.”


Commissioner Alan Word doesn’t see things the same way. Total calls are up by 52 in 2015 compared to 2008, but miscellaneous calls accounted for 64 percent of the 2015 total.

Miscellaneous calls are any that don’t fall under one of the main categories and range from wellness checks and barking dogs to juveniles, Towns said. The calls don’t include civil calls, he said.

“We used to get calls about bats in the house,” Towns said.

The calls in the report are complaints, the sheriff said. The totals do not include citations.

Total calls and calls for serious crimes and crashes dropped below 2008 levels from 2009-2015. The county lost eight road patrol officers due to layoffs. As a result, the average number of calls per year handled by a deputy rose from 305 in 2008 to 561.25 in 2015. That amounts to 0.7 calls per day more.

While the sheriff painted a bleak picture as far as staffing was concerned and stated the county’s finances had returned to normal, Commissioner Lewis Hilkert called into question Towns’ response to what type of information the commissioners wanted and his understanding of the county’s financial picture.

“You are stating we are back to normal,” Hilkert said. “We are not back to normal.”

Revenues in 2008 was $14,173,000, Hilkert said. In 2009, that amount dropped to $11,174,000. In 2015, total revenues were $13,228,000 he said.

“We are still down $850,000 less revenue in 2015 than in 2008,” Hilkert said.

Towns said he was going by the numbers he got off the county’s website.

“You say we are not back to normal, we are not back to normal in the sense of the community safety situation,” Towns said.

Hilkert broke down the revenue streams for the county. Sales tax revenues are up, but local government funds and investment income are down sharply.

“Do we have casino funds that we didn’t have before,” Hilkert said. “Yes we did. We are not guaranteed those casino funds are going to be here today, tomorrow or five years from now.

“The casino funds are being set aside for capital improvements.”

Towns suggested if that’s the case, the county could designate a new use for money already set aside for capital improvement, but Hilkert said before the casino money existed, there was no money for capital improvement.

“It came out of the general fund,” Commissioner Brian Davis said.

Ruskey went back to the sheriff’s main point that if you break down the numbers, the deputies are doing double the work compared to 2008.

“We are not asking for the eight to be returned, we are asking for three, which is less than half,” Ruskey said. “I think that’s a pretty reasonable request.

The manpower shortage is causing response times to run from 30-60 minutes, Ruskey said.

“We are operating bare bones,” Ruskey said.

For Word, the workload has been static over the past few years, and he questioned the sheriff’s allocation of other deputies if the road patrol is such a need. That turned into a discussion on the need for a DARE officer.

Towns said the position, funded through other sources, actually nets the county $12,000 to $15,000 per year. The clerks, of which Williams has only three, are more efficient that most counties with four or five, the sheriff said.

“What we are talking about is a matter of life and death,” Towns said. “People are dying.”

Word countered the sheriff’s numbers don’t back up that claim.

Davis reminded Towns that his DARE officer doesn’t make any money for the department as the grants bring in $23,000, but the position costs $48,000. And he said the sheriff reduced his administrative line item from $141,000 to $119,000 for the 2016 budget.

“Which is a fair thing, because you had four people and now you are down to three,” Davis said.

The commissioners did not budge from their decision not to assent to Towns’ request and Towns later posted a letter on Facebook asking residents to send to commissioners imploring them to change their minds.

James Pruitt may be reached at
publisher@thevillagereporter.com

Previous ArticleFulton Commissioners To Let Deputy Keep Service Weapon
Next Article Scoring Summary For Tuesday, May 3

Related Posts

With Love, Betsy Salon In Swanton Celebrates Grand Opening

March 14, 2026 News

Fulton County OSU Extension Offering Food Safety Manager Training

March 14, 2026 News

Governor DeWine Outlines Education, Safety Priorities In 2026 State Of The State Address

March 14, 2026 News

FULTON TOWNSHIP TRUSTEES Trustees: Review Cemetery Software Options, Approve Road Resolutions

March 14, 2026 News

Comments are closed.

Account
  • Login
Sponsored By
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • Opt-out preferences
  • Privacy Statement (US)
  • Disclaimer
© 2026 The Village Reporter. All Rights Reserved.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}

Sign In or Register

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below.

Lost password?