Close Menu
  • Home
  • Subscribe
  • Current Edition
  • Store Locations
  • Photo Albums
  • Rate Card
  • Classifieds
  • Contact Us
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Tuesday, March 10
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube TikTok
Login
The Village Reporter
  • Home
  • Subscribe
  • Current Edition
  • Store Locations
  • Photo Albums
  • Rate Card
  • Classifieds
  • Contact Us
The Village Reporter
Home»News»Fire Protection Rift Between Delta & York Township Grows Wider
News

Fire Protection Rift Between Delta & York Township Grows Wider

By Newspaper StaffOctober 7, 2016Updated:November 30, 2016No Comments4 Mins Read
Share Facebook Twitter Email Copy Link

delta-firehouse1

Regarding fire and rescue protection, the question the residents of the Village of Delta and York Township may soon be asking is not “Where’s the fire?” but, more to the point, “Who is going to put the fire out?” At the last Delta village council meeting on Monday, October 3, the Council voted 5-1 in favor of sending a letter informing the trustees of York Township of the Village’s intent to terminate the current Fire Service Agreement when it expires on December 31, 2017.

The reason for the letter, drafted by Delta Law Director Kevin Heban, stems from the inability of the Village and the Township to negotiate an agreement of the percentage of financial responsibilities each entity should assume for fire and rescue services. In its third paragraph the letter says, “With no apparent resolution addressing the concerns raised by the Village, the village administrator has been directed to evaluate viable fire protection options for its residents.”

With the Village being contractually obligated to give the Township a six-month notice before withdrawing, the letter will serve as that notification.

“The last paragraph just leaves open the possibility of further negotiations between the Village and the Township and that the Village would be open to a proposal that the Township may want to make in the future,” stated Mr. Heban.


“My concern, as your administrator, (is) we have repeatedly tried to initiate to pursue some viable solution for this going forward, very unsuccessfully,” said Administrator Brad Peebles. “I think this council needs to take some action to begin to look at its options going forward. We can’t afford to be caught at the eleventh hour trying to figure out what we’re going to do for fire service.”

Councilman Art Thomas put forth a motion to send the letter and it was quickly seconded by Councilman Richard Maurer. A great deal of discussion followed the motion with Councilwoman Lynn Frank and Councilman Anthony Dawson recommending it be tabled until the next meeting to give everyone a chance to consider all the data. The rest of the Council, however, felt that enough time had passed.

“But we know this issue has gone on for how many months if not years,” said Mr. Thomas. “The percentage of what the Delta citizens pay towards fire protection is out of whack and we’ve known it for how long?”


Mr. Dawson suggested the Council delay sending the letter until after the public hearing regarding the Village’s request to separate from York Township which will be heard in front of the Fulton County Commissioners on Thursday, October 13.

“We’ve been talking about this for almost a year now with no resolution,” countered Mr. Peebles. “To me this validates to the Commissioners that we are focused on trying to get this resolved. I am definitely afraid that we are going to posture ourselves to get backed into a corner so that we have no option but to say ‘Whatever you (Township) say, we’ll do.’ That’s what I’m going to work diligently to avoid.”

The vote was finally taken and passed with only Mr. Dawson dissenting.

If no agreement can be negotiated it places both the Village and the Township in a precarious position. While York Township provides fire and rescue service to Delta, the Village leases the fire station to the Township. No agreement would leave them both scrambling for a solution.


In other news, the Council unanimously passed the first reading of Ordinance #16-26 which places a six-month moratorium on the issuance of permits within the Village which would facilitate the cultivation, processing or sale of medical marijuana. The ordinance is very similar to what many Ohio municipalities are enacting to allow themselves time to adequately review all applicable codes to formulate a response to the state law passed last month allowing the use of medical marijuana.

Also passed on its third and final reading was a resolution authorizing the Administrator to enter an agreement with the Ohio Depart of Transportation for the inspection of bridges for the next three years through 2019.

The next Council meeting is scheduled for Monday, October 17 at 7:00 PM.

Bill O’Connell may be reached at publisher@thevillagereporter.com

Previous ArticleScoring Summary – Thursday, October 6th, 2016
Next Article All Things Food Co-Op Honored With Ribbon Cutting

Related Posts

Bryan Area Chamber Of Commerce Presents Awards At Annual Banquet

March 9, 2026 News

Artesian Of Pioneer Undergoing Office Expansion

March 9, 2026 News

Wabash Cannonball Corridor Hosts Annual Meeting

March 9, 2026 News

Samuel Mancino’s In Archbold To Close After 25 Years

March 9, 2026 News

Comments are closed.

Account
  • Login
Sponsored By
  • Opt-out preferences
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
© 2026 ThemeSphere. Designed by ThemeSphere.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}

Sign In or Register

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below.

Lost password?