Close Menu
The Village Reporter
  • Home
  • Subscribe
  • Current Edition
  • Store Locations
  • Photo Albums
  • Rate Card
  • Classifieds
  • Contact Us
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Sunday, March 15
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube TikTok
Login
The Village Reporter
  • Home
  • Subscribe
  • Current Edition
  • Store Locations
  • Photo Albums
  • Rate Card
  • Classifieds
  • Contact Us
The Village Reporter
Home»News»Yost Cracks Down On Shady Used-Car Dealerships
News

Yost Cracks Down On Shady Used-Car Dealerships

By Newspaper StaffApril 28, 2025No Comments2 Mins Read
Share Facebook Twitter Email Copy Link


(PRESS RELEASE – Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost is suing six defunct used-car dealerships that failed to provide vehicle titles to dozens of consumers.

In each of the lawsuits – filed in the Common Pleas Courts of Butler, Fairfield, Fayette, Licking, Stark and Wood counties – an auto dealership and its operator are accused of violating Ohio’s Consumer Sales Practices Act and the Certificate of Motor Vehicles Act.

“Buying a used car without knowing the dealer’s reputation is a roll of the fuzzy dice,” Yost said. “Reading online reviews and checking for a history of complaints could spare you the headache of a bad deal.”

To help consumers with title problems who bought used cars from the defendants, Yost’s Consumer Protection Section has issued payments totaling $312,690 from the Title Defect Recision (TDR) fund.


The TDR fund aids consumers who do not receive titles within 40 days of a vehicle purchase, as Ohio law requires.

Here’s a summary of the six lawsuits:

Butler County: Sirius Motors
Timothy Thacker and his Monroe used-car dealership are named in this lawsuit. Yost’s office has resolved six title-related complaints using $86,319 from the TDR fund.


Fairfield County: Highway 22 Auto Sales
This lawsuit names Debra Jeffers and her Lancaster dealership. Yost’s office has resolved 10 title-related complaints using $39,121 from the TDR fund.

Fayette County: Robinson Auto
Shawn Robinson and his Jeffersonville dealership are named in this lawsuit. Yost’s office has resolved 10 title-related complaints using $62,454 from the TDR fund.

Licking County: Ohio Luxury Imports
This lawsuit names Renato Jovanovski and his Reynoldsburg dealership. Yost’s office has resolved 15 title-related complaints with $71,858 from the TDR fund.

Stark County: Automax of Canton
Elias Eberly and his Canton dealership are named in this lawsuit. Yost’s office has resolved five title-related complaints using $46,055 from the TDR fund.


Wood County: Prestige Family Cars
John Stauffer and his Perrysburg dealership are named in this lawsuit. Yost’s office has resolved three title-related complaints with $6,883 from the TDR fund.

Ohioans who believe they have been victims of unfair or deceptive practices can file a complaint with the Consumer Protection Section at www.OhioAttorneyGeneral.gov or by calling 1-800-282-0515.


 

Previous ArticleHigh School Sports Scoreboard For April 28, 2025
Next Article NWOAL BASEBALL: Archbold Forges First Place Tie After Blanking Evergreen, 12-0

Related Posts

With Love, Betsy Salon In Swanton Celebrates Grand Opening

March 14, 2026 News

Fulton County OSU Extension Offering Food Safety Manager Training

March 14, 2026 News

Governor DeWine Outlines Education, Safety Priorities In 2026 State Of The State Address

March 14, 2026 News

FULTON TOWNSHIP TRUSTEES Trustees: Review Cemetery Software Options, Approve Road Resolutions

March 14, 2026 News

Comments are closed.

Account
  • Login
Sponsored By
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • Opt-out preferences
  • Privacy Statement (US)
  • Disclaimer
© 2026 The Village Reporter. All Rights Reserved.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}

Sign In or Register

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below.

Lost password?